High-t Vector-Meson Photoproduction
- Some Phenomenological Considerations -
J.A. Crittenden
P.I. Bonn
Last year at the EPS conference in Tampere, ZEUS presented the first
measurements of the differential cross section
for proton-dissociative , , and photoproduction
at values for |t| between 1 and 10 . In two weeks we will
present at the ICHEP conference in Osaka an update of these results
with an increase in statistics of a factor of three. These
measurements are intrinsically interesting due to the fact that
the |t| values exceed the mass scales in the process, reaching
an asymptotic region where the t dependence yields direct
information on the dynamics of the scattering process. This is the
first measurement at |t| values comparable in magnitude to the Q2
values attained at SLAC in 1967, when Bjorken scaling and the
presence of point-like charged constituents of the proton were
discovered. Recently it became clear that our data are sensitive
enough to show a clear preference of a power n of 3 in a
parametrization of the differential cross section of the form t-n,
appearing to exclude powers of 2 and 4 with considerable
significance. This scaling law seems to indicate that we are
observing the lowest-order process in a quantum field theoretical
description of diffractive strong interactions.
The pQCD model of Brodsky et al based on two-gluon exchange predicts
such a t dependence, but only in the case of longitudinal
polarization of the vector meson, which our data exclude to an accuracy
of about 10%. Ivanov et al have published work on a
chiral-odd contribution to the production of transverse mesons which
they claim is dominant in the t region of our measurements, but
this contribution scales with t-4. Kochelev et al have
calculated the contribution of the exchange of an anomalous
trajectory with the quantum numbers of the f1 axial vector meson
(``Regge-ized f1 exchange''). Via private communication I
received their prediction for the t dependence and found it to be
a remarkably good fit to our data.
Unfortunately, due to time constraints at the time of this talk, I
was not able to make the scaling and comparison plots with the new
points for Osaka, and used instead last year's Tampere points. Since
the results are consistent, I do not expect the messages of this
talk to change, but it will be interesting to see these plots with
the new points.